Exam Schools Admissions Criteria Working Group Simulations Overview

  • Additional Background Information and Data Reviewed by the Boston Public Schools Exam Schools Admissions Criteria Working Group

    In July 2020, Superintendent Cassellius convened an Exam Schools Admissions Working Group to develop and submit a recommendation made to her on revising the exam school admissions criteria for entrance during the 2021-2022 school year. The revisions are in direct response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on applicants during the latter half of School Year (SY) 2019-2020.

    The Working Group was tasked with recommending a temporary, one-year approach to the process for admissions to the district’s three exam schools: Boston Latin Academy, Boston Latin School, and John D. O’Bryant School of Mathematics and Science. The policy will be in place for one year as the City of Boston and Boston Public Schools (BPS) collaborate on a focused response to the global pandemic.

    The members comprising the working group were:

    • Samuel Acevedo, Opportunity and Achievement Gap Task Force Co-Chair
    • Acacia Aguirre, John D. O’Bryant parent 
    • Michael Contompasis, Former Boston Latin School Headmaster and Former BPS Superintendent
    • Matt Cregor, on behalf of NAACP
    • Tanya Freeman-Wisdom, John D. O’Bryant, Head of School 
    • Katherine Grassa, Curley K-8, Principal
    • Zena Lum, Boston Latin Academy parent
    • Rachel Skerritt, Boston Latin School, Head of School
    • Tanisha Sullivan, President, NAACP Boston

    The Working Group met weekly in August 2020 and twice weekly in September 2020, for a total of 12 meetings. The group reviewed a wide range of data throughout the course of their meetings. Topics covered included: student grades, admissions criteria in other school districts, and enrollment trends in the exam schools compared to overall BPS enrollment. 

    They presented their recommendations to the Superintendent on September 29, 2020. Dr. Cassellius presented the recommendation to the School Committee on October 8, 2020. The School Committee voted unanimously to approve the recommendation on October 21, 2020.

    We are providing the following information publicly so that all interested stakeholders can develop a deeper understanding of the Working Group’s recommendation in advance of the upcoming application and admissions process. The following details the recommendation and data used to support the decision:

    The Recommendation

    Building the pool of qualified applicants

    According to the policy unanimously adopted by the School Committee, the Exam School entrance exam is suspended for one year, and BPS will use the following criteria to identify students who qualify for admittance under the one-year policy: 

    Students will need to demonstrate that they have:

    1. Scored Met or Exceeded Expectations on the 2019 English Language Arts (ELA) and Math MCAS

    OR

    2. Earned a B or higher average grade point average (GPA) during the first two terms of School Year SY2019-2020 

    Generating invitations from that pool of qualified applicants

    The first 20% of seats at each exam school will be reserved for the top-ranking students citywide, based on GPA.

    The remaining 80% of invitations will be distributed using a combination of GPA and student home zip code. The breakdown is as follows:

    • Each zip code in the city will be allocated a certain number of seats that are proportionate to the percentage of school-aged children living in that zip code
    • Students in each zip code will be invited based on their GPA ranking, starting with the highest GPA

    The Working Group arrived at this recommendation based on their assertion that it would be more equitable in the current environment to ensure that each exam school educates a student population that more closely reflects the overall enrollment demographics of all BPS schools.

    The Working Group also recommended that BPS provide appropriate support – both before and during the school year - for SY21-22 exam school admittees who are deemed academically prepared for exam school content but may require more time to get acclimated to the pace of exam school study. 

    The Working Group also suggested that the district expand the Exam School Initiative (ESI), beginning as early as 4th grade and running through October of the students’ 6th-grade year. This would provide a greater focus on academic acceleration in both ELA and math.

    Finally, the Working Group recommended that they continue convening to advise on permanent efforts to expand the applicant pool, making use of the new NWEA test and other factors. This rationale is based on what can be learned from applying the recommendations to this year's admissions and incorporating what the working group has learned in reviewing practices from other districts.

    Simulations

    The Working Group requested multiple simulations to understand the impacts of the proposal. There is no way to run a full simulation using historical years or current year data, mainly due to missing information from non-BPS students and school ranking preferences from current students, which can not be predicted. 

    • What was available to simulate:
      • Changes to SY20-21 invitations for all SY19-20 actual applicants (BPS and non-BPS) using GPA (last year spring + 1st two terms of the current year) and ISEE scores (the district’s previous exam provider)
      • Changes to SY20-21 invitations for all BPS students using other available data sources (e.g., grades prior to COVID)
      • Potential invitations for SY21-22 for BPS students only
    • What was not available to simulate:
      • Changes to SY20-21 invitations for non-BPS students using data outside of GPA and ISEE scores
      • Exam scores if an exam was administered in Fall 2020
      • Student preferences for SY21-22

    The continued goal of the Working Group was to identify opportunities to ensure more equitable access to the three exam schools, so each school’s enrollment would more closely reflect the district’s overall enrollment. 

    Their ultimate recommendation of the 20% - 80% split was based on the goal to increase the number of expected seats for traditionally underrepresented neighborhoods across the city.

    The table below shows the actual number of invitations to exam schools - by neighborhood - for the current academic year and the projected number of invitations for next year using the 20% - 80% approach. 

    Zip Code

    Neighborhood

    % of School-Aged Children

    SY20-21 Actual

    Seats under Simulations

    # Applicants

    # Invitations

    Average # Invitations

    02108

    Beacon Hill

    0.3%

    <6

    <6

    4.0

    02109

    Downtown

    0.1%

    8

    7

    5.7

    02110

    Downtown

    0.3%

    7

    7

    2.7

    02111

    Chinatown

    0.8%

    43

    24

    10.0

    02113

    North End

    0.3%

    7

    7

    7.7

    02114

    Beacon Hill/West End

    0.7%

    22

    19

    13.0

    02115

    Fenway

    1.4%

    33

    15

    15.3

    02116

    Back Bay

    1.3%

    44

    27

    19.7

    02199

    Back Bay

    0.1%

    <6

    <6

    0.3

    02118

    South End

    3.3%

    105

    36

    32.0

    02119

    Roxbury

    6.1%

    136

    27

    56.0

    02120

    Roxbury

    1.5%

    46

    17

    15.3

    02121

    Roxbury

    8.2%

    218

    27

    78.0

    02122

    Dorchester

    4.6%

    186

    62

    53.7

    02124

    Dorchester

    12.4%

    335

    84

    123.0

    02125

    Dorchester

    6.3%

    174

    47

    66.0

    02126

    Mattapan

    6.3%

    131

    20

    58.0

    02127

    South Boston

    4.2%

    108

    35

    42.3

    02128

    East Boston

    9.0%

    252

    57

    80.7

    02129

    Charlestown

    3.0%

    107

    56

    39.0

    02130

    Jamaica Plain

    5.1%

    120

    77

    61.0

    02131

    Roslindale

    6.5%

    180

    94

    69.7

    02132

    West Roxbury

    4.8%

    190

    133

    76.0

    02134

    Allston

    1.2%

    36

    17

    13.0

    02163

    Allston

    0.1%

    <6

    <6

    0.0

    02135

    Brighton

    3.7%

    97

    52

    35.7

    02136

    Hyde Park

    7.8%

    214

    68

    80.3

    02210

    Seaport

    0.1%

    <6

    <6

    2.7

    02215

    Fenway/Kenmore

    0.4%

    14

    8

    4.7

    There are predicted changes in neighborhoods across the city, with some seeing an increase in enrollment, while others will see a decline. The Working Group made its recommendation for this model after reviewing other simulations.

    While there has been a discussion of adding priority for current BPS students, the School Committee ultimately decided that all Boston students - from BPS or other schools - should be considered equally for the next round of admissions. 

    Next Steps

    Students attending BPS schools will be contacted by the district in January 2021 to apply for the exam schools based on their eligibility. Students currently not attending BPS schools can apply by visiting www.bostonpublicschools.org/exam. The deadline for non-BPS students to apply is Friday, January 15. BPS has taken the following steps to ensure the public is informed of the application and deadline process:

    • Social media promotion on BPS accounts
    • Informational letter to families, translated into 9 languages sent to BPS families along with non-BPS schools for distribution
    • Information sessions for school leaders from both BPS and non-BPS schools
    • Mentions from Dr. Cassellius during her Superintendent's Report in School Committee meetings, in tandem with mentions during relevant media appearances
    • Virtual information sessions with interpretation services in multiple languages (visit here to view the videos)
    • Mentions in the BPS Weekly Update newsletter

    On Wednesday, January 13, 2021, the School Committee receives a recommendation at their bi-weekly meeting regarding continuance of the Working Group, suggested to become a permanent Task Force of the Committee.